Food as Medicine for HIV: A Randomized Trial of Medically Tailored Meals and Lifestyle Intervention
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this data on November 14, 2023. Link to the current ClinicalTrials.gov record.Recruitment Status
RECRUITING (See Contacts and Locations)Verified November 2023 by University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, Community Servings, Massachusetts General Hospital, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)
Sponsor
University of North Carolina, Chapel HillInformation Provided by (Responsible Party)
University of North Carolina, Chapel HillClinicaltrials.gov Identifier
NCT05026723Other Study ID Numbers: 20-3509
First Submitted: August 23, 2021
First Posted: August 30, 2021
Last Update Posted: November 18, 2023
Last Verified: November 2023
History of Changes
Listing a study on this site does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. The safety and scientific validity of a study listed on ClinicalTrials.gov is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Know the risks and potential benefits of clinical studies and talk to your health care provider before participating.
ClinicalTrials.gov, a resource provided by the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), is a registry and results information database of clinical research studies sponsored or funded by a broad range of public and private organizations around the world. Not all studies listed on ClinicalTrials.gov are funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) or other agencies of the U.S. Federal Government. Not all listed studies are regulated and/or reviewed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration or other governmental entities.
Information on ClinicalTrials.gov is provided by study sponsors and investigators, and they are responsible for ensuring that the studies follow all applicable laws and regulations. NLM staff do not verify the scientific validity or relevance of the submitted information beyond a limited quality control review for apparent errors, deficiencies, or inconsistencies.
Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Before you participate in a study, discuss all options with your health care provider and other trusted advisors. For more information about participating in clinical studies, see Learn About Clinical Studies, which includes questions that you might want to ask before deciding to participate in a study.
For more information about using the information on ClinicalTrials.gov, please also see Terms and Conditions.
See also the Web Policies and Notices for the NIH web site.
Study Description
In contemporary practice for people with HIV, type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) has become an important comorbidity. T2DM is 1.5 times more common in people with HIV than the general population. Among those with T2DM, people with HIV have greater risk for weight gain, lower diet quality, and higher hemoglobin A1c. All of this puts people with HIV and T2DM at substantial risk for complications, including chronic kidney disease, cardiovascular disease, and premature mortality. Food insecurity, "lack of access to enough food for an active, healthy life", is a major contributor to this risk. Food insecurity is 2 to 3 times more common among people with HIV than the general population. Food insecurity is associated with both worse T2DM control and more T2DM complications.Medically tailored meal home delivery programs relieve food insecurity for people with HIV. Medically tailored meals emerged to treat food insecurity among those with AIDS in the 1990's. Medically tailored meal programs deliver fully prepared meals, tailored by a registered dietitian to an individual's medical needs. Although HIV care has changed, medically tailored meal interventions for people with HIV have not kept pace. Most medically tailored meal programs do not provide the intensive lifestyle intervention needed to counter the health threats seen in modern HIV care. These threats include the metabolic effects of anti-retroviral medications, chronic inflammation, aging, and obesogenic environments. For these reasons, it is critical to test new models of medically tailored meal for people with HIV.
The investigators has developed a medically tailored meal intervention that combines meal delivery with an evidence-based lifestyle intervention designed to improve weight loss and diabetes self-management. The goal for this project is to test whether this medically tailored meal intervention can lead to improvements in weight, hemoglobin A1c, and in patient-reported outcomes such as food insecurity, quality of life, and diabetes distress, compared with a standard medically tailored meal intervention.
Thus, the investigators propose a randomized comparative effectiveness trial to assess a community-based medically tailored meals intervention (n=200). It will be conducted among diverse participants with HIV and T2DM or high risk for T2DM, referred for medically tailored meals. Adults with hemoglobin A1c less than 12.0%, and BMI ≥ 23 kg/m^2 will be enrolled and randomly assigned to intervention or standard medically tailored meals. The intervention group will receive meal delivery and intensive lifestyle intervention for 12 months, while the comparison group will receive meal delivery along with standard nutrition education for 12 months. Outcomes will be assessed at 6, 12, and 18 months. The primary outcome is weight at 6 months. Secondary outcomes include hemoglobin a1c, food security, quality of life, and diabetes distress.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
|
|
Study Design
Study Type | Interventional |
---|---|
Anticipated Enrollment | 200 participants |
Design Allocation | Randomized |
Interventional Model | Parallel Assignment |
Masking | Single |
Primary Purpose | Treatment |
Official Title | Food as Medicine for HIV: A Randomized Trial of Medically Tailored Meals and Lifestyle Intervention |
Study Start Date | October 4, 2021 |
Anticipated Primary Completion Date | August 2026 |
Anticipated Study Completion Date | February 2027 |
Groups and Cohorts
Group/ Cohort | Intervention/ Treatment |
---|---|
|
|
|
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Bodyweight at Month 6 [6 months] Bodyweight measured in Kg
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Bodyweight at Month 12 [12 months] Bodyweight measured in Kg
- Bodyweight at Month 18 [18 months] Bodyweight measured in Kg
- Hemoglobin A1c at Month 6 [6 months] Hemoglobin A1c Level
- Hemoglobin A1c at Month 12 [12 months] Hemoglobin A1c Level
- Hemoglobin A1c at Month 18 [18 months] Hemoglobin A1c Level
- Health-Related Quality of Life Score as assessed by Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-29 at Month 6 [6 months] The PROMIS-29 includes seven health related quality of life domains (Physical Functioning, Anxiety, Depression, Fatigue, Sleep Disturbance, Social Functioning, and Pain), and the pain domain has two subdomains (interference and intensity). Raw scores, except pain intensity, are transformed using the T-score metric based on the item response theory calibrations in which scores have a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 for the general population in the US. A higher PROMIS T-score implies more of the concept being measured; i.e., a higher PROMIS score on physical function indicates better functioning, whereas a higher score on depression indicates more severe depressive symptoms. Will report overall score and scores for each domain. From these data will also calculate a PROMIS-Preference (PROPr score) (PROPr scores range from -0.022 (worst) to 1.0 (best)).
- Health-Related Quality of Life Score as assessed by PROMIS-29 at Month 12 [12 months] The PROMIS-29 includes seven health related quality of life domains (Physical Functioning, Anxiety, Depression, Fatigue, Sleep Disturbance, Social Functioning, and Pain), and the pain domain has two subdomains (interference and intensity). Raw scores, except pain intensity, are transformed using the T-score metric based on the item response theory calibrations in which scores have a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 for the general population in the US. A higher PROMIS T-score implies more of the concept being measured; i.e., a higher PROMIS score on physical function indicates better functioning, whereas a higher score on depression indicates more severe depressive symptoms. Will report overall score and scores for each domain. From these data will also calculate a PROMIS-Preference (PROPr score) (PROPr scores range from -0.022 (worst) to 1.0 (best)).
- Health-Related Quality of Life Score as assessed by PROMIS-29 at Month 18 [18 months] The PROMIS-29 includes seven health related quality of life domains (Physical Functioning, Anxiety, Depression, Fatigue, Sleep Disturbance, Social Functioning, and Pain), and the pain domain has two subdomains (interference and intensity). Raw scores, except pain intensity, are transformed using the T-score metric based on the item response theory calibrations in which scores have a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 for the general population in the US. A higher PROMIS T-score implies more of the concept being measured; i.e., a higher PROMIS score on physical function indicates better functioning, whereas a higher score on depression indicates more severe depressive symptoms. Will report overall score and scores for each domain. From these data will also calculate a PROMIS-Preference (PROPr score) (PROPr scores range from -0.022 (worst) to 1.0 (best)).
- Depressive Symptom Score at Month 6 [6 months] Depressive Symptoms as assessed by PROMIS Short Form (PROMIS SF) v1.0 - Depression 4a. Raw scores are transformed using the T-score metric based on the item response theory calibrations in which scores have a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 for the general population in the US. A higher PROMIS T-score implies more of the concept being measured; i.e., a higher PROMIS score on depression indicates more severe depressive symptoms.
- Depressive Symptom Score at Month 12 [12 months] Depressive Symptoms as assessed by PROMIS SF v1.0 - Depression 4a. Raw scores are transformed using the T-score metric based on the item response theory calibrations in which scores have a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 for the general population in the US. A higher PROMIS T-score implies more of the concept being measured; i.e., a higher PROMIS score on depression indicates more severe depressive symptoms.
- Depressive Symptom Score at Month 18 [18 months] Depressive Symptoms as assessed by PROMIS SF v1.0 - Depression 4a. Raw scores are transformed using the T-score metric based on the item response theory calibrations in which scores have a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 for the general population in the US. A higher PROMIS T-score implies more of the concept being measured; i.e., a higher PROMIS score on depression indicates more severe depressive symptoms.
- Diabetes Distress Score as assessed by Problem Areas in Diabetes (PAID)-11 at Month 6 [6 months] Score ranges from 11-55 with higher scores indicating greater diabetes distress
- Diabetes Distress Score as assessed by PAID-11 at Month 12 [12 months] Score ranges from 11-55 with higher scores indicating greater diabetes distress
- Diabetes Distress Score as assessed by PAID-11 at Month 18 [18 months] Score ranges from 11-55 with higher scores indicating greater diabetes distress
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study | 18 Years and Older (Adult, Older Adult) |
---|---|
Sexes Eligible for Study | All |
Accepts Healthy Volunteers | No |
Inclusion Criteria |
|
Exclusion Criteria |
|
Contacts and Locations
Sponsors and Collaborators | University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, Community Servings, Massachusetts General Hospital, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) |
---|---|
Community Servings, Massachusetts General Hospital, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) | |
Locations |
|
Investigators |
|
More Information
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
- Diabetes Mellitus
- Glucose Metabolism Disorders
- Metabolic Diseases
- Endocrine System Diseases