Food as Medicine for HIV: A Randomized Trial of Medically Tailored Meals and Lifestyle Intervention

ClinicalTrials.gov processed this data on November 14, 2023. Link to the current ClinicalTrials.gov record.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING (See Contacts and Locations)
Verified November 2023 by University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, Community Servings, Massachusetts General Hospital, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)

Sponsor

University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

Information Provided by (Responsible Party)

University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier

NCT05026723
Other Study ID Numbers: 20-3509
First Submitted: August 23, 2021
First Posted: August 30, 2021
Last Update Posted: November 18, 2023
Last Verified: November 2023
History of Changes

Listing a study on this site does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. The safety and scientific validity of a study listed on ClinicalTrials.gov is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Know the risks and potential benefits of clinical studies and talk to your health care provider before participating.

ClinicalTrials.gov, a resource provided by the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), is a registry and results information database of clinical research studies sponsored or funded by a broad range of public and private organizations around the world. Not all studies listed on ClinicalTrials.gov are funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) or other agencies of the U.S. Federal Government. Not all listed studies are regulated and/or reviewed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration or other governmental entities.

Information on ClinicalTrials.gov is provided by study sponsors and investigators, and they are responsible for ensuring that the studies follow all applicable laws and regulations. NLM staff do not verify the scientific validity or relevance of the submitted information beyond a limited quality control review for apparent errors, deficiencies, or inconsistencies.

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Before you participate in a study, discuss all options with your health care provider and other trusted advisors. For more information about participating in clinical studies, see Learn About Clinical Studies, which includes questions that you might want to ask before deciding to participate in a study.

For more information about using the information on ClinicalTrials.gov, please also see Terms and Conditions.

See also the Web Policies and Notices for the NIH web site.

Study Description

In contemporary practice for people with HIV, type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) has become an important comorbidity. T2DM is 1.5 times more common in people with HIV than the general population. Among those with T2DM, people with HIV have greater risk for weight gain, lower diet quality, and higher hemoglobin A1c. All of this puts people with HIV and T2DM at substantial risk for complications, including chronic kidney disease, cardiovascular disease, and premature mortality. Food insecurity, "lack of access to enough food for an active, healthy life", is a major contributor to this risk. Food insecurity is 2 to 3 times more common among people with HIV than the general population. Food insecurity is associated with both worse T2DM control and more T2DM complications.

Medically tailored meal home delivery programs relieve food insecurity for people with HIV. Medically tailored meals emerged to treat food insecurity among those with AIDS in the 1990's. Medically tailored meal programs deliver fully prepared meals, tailored by a registered dietitian to an individual's medical needs. Although HIV care has changed, medically tailored meal interventions for people with HIV have not kept pace. Most medically tailored meal programs do not provide the intensive lifestyle intervention needed to counter the health threats seen in modern HIV care. These threats include the metabolic effects of anti-retroviral medications, chronic inflammation, aging, and obesogenic environments. For these reasons, it is critical to test new models of medically tailored meal for people with HIV.

The investigators has developed a medically tailored meal intervention that combines meal delivery with an evidence-based lifestyle intervention designed to improve weight loss and diabetes self-management. The goal for this project is to test whether this medically tailored meal intervention can lead to improvements in weight, hemoglobin A1c, and in patient-reported outcomes such as food insecurity, quality of life, and diabetes distress, compared with a standard medically tailored meal intervention.

Thus, the investigators propose a randomized comparative effectiveness trial to assess a community-based medically tailored meals intervention (n=200). It will be conducted among diverse participants with HIV and T2DM or high risk for T2DM, referred for medically tailored meals. Adults with hemoglobin A1c less than 12.0%, and BMI ≥ 23 kg/m^2 will be enrolled and randomly assigned to intervention or standard medically tailored meals. The intervention group will receive meal delivery and intensive lifestyle intervention for 12 months, while the comparison group will receive meal delivery along with standard nutrition education for 12 months. Outcomes will be assessed at 6, 12, and 18 months. The primary outcome is weight at 6 months. Secondary outcomes include hemoglobin a1c, food security, quality of life, and diabetes distress.
Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment
  • Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
  • HIV Infections
  • PreDiabetes
  • Behavioral: MTM + ILI
  • Behavioral: Standard MTM

Study Design

Study TypeInterventional
Anticipated Enrollment200 participants
Design AllocationRandomized
Interventional ModelParallel Assignment
MaskingSingle
Primary PurposeTreatment
Official TitleFood as Medicine for HIV: A Randomized Trial of Medically Tailored Meals and Lifestyle Intervention
Study Start DateOctober 4, 2021
Anticipated Primary Completion DateAugust 2026
Anticipated Study Completion DateFebruary 2027

Groups and Cohorts

Group/ CohortIntervention/ Treatment
  • Medically Tailored Meal (MTM) + Intensive Lifestyle Intervention (ILI)
    • The Medically Tailored Meal (MTM) + Intensive Lifestyle Intervention (ILI) consists of weekly home meal delivery; an explanation of the medical tailoring of the meals; and a 20-session telephone lifestyle intervention change program designed to complement the period of meal delivery and prepare for the period after meal delivery with behavioral and skill-building approaches to sustain the benefit of the intervention.
  • Behavioral: MTM + ILI
    • Weekly home meal delivery; an explanation of the medical tailoring of the meals; and a 20-session telephone lifestyle intervention change program
  • Standard MTM
    • The Standard Medically Tailored Meal (MTM) intervention (ILI) consists of weekly home meal delivery; an explanation of the medical tailoring of the meals; and an initial consultation with a dietitian.
  • Behavioral: Standard MTM

    Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Bodyweight at Month 6 [6 months]
      Bodyweight measured in Kg

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Bodyweight at Month 12 [12 months]
      Bodyweight measured in Kg
    2. Bodyweight at Month 18 [18 months]
      Bodyweight measured in Kg
    3. Hemoglobin A1c at Month 6 [6 months]
      Hemoglobin A1c Level
    4. Hemoglobin A1c at Month 12 [12 months]
      Hemoglobin A1c Level
    5. Hemoglobin A1c at Month 18 [18 months]
      Hemoglobin A1c Level
    6. Health-Related Quality of Life Score as assessed by Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-29 at Month 6 [6 months]
      The PROMIS-29 includes seven health related quality of life domains (Physical Functioning, Anxiety, Depression, Fatigue, Sleep Disturbance, Social Functioning, and Pain), and the pain domain has two subdomains (interference and intensity). Raw scores, except pain intensity, are transformed using the T-score metric based on the item response theory calibrations in which scores have a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 for the general population in the US. A higher PROMIS T-score implies more of the concept being measured; i.e., a higher PROMIS score on physical function indicates better functioning, whereas a higher score on depression indicates more severe depressive symptoms. Will report overall score and scores for each domain. From these data will also calculate a PROMIS-Preference (PROPr score) (PROPr scores range from -0.022 (worst) to 1.0 (best)).
    7. Health-Related Quality of Life Score as assessed by PROMIS-29 at Month 12 [12 months]
      The PROMIS-29 includes seven health related quality of life domains (Physical Functioning, Anxiety, Depression, Fatigue, Sleep Disturbance, Social Functioning, and Pain), and the pain domain has two subdomains (interference and intensity). Raw scores, except pain intensity, are transformed using the T-score metric based on the item response theory calibrations in which scores have a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 for the general population in the US. A higher PROMIS T-score implies more of the concept being measured; i.e., a higher PROMIS score on physical function indicates better functioning, whereas a higher score on depression indicates more severe depressive symptoms. Will report overall score and scores for each domain. From these data will also calculate a PROMIS-Preference (PROPr score) (PROPr scores range from -0.022 (worst) to 1.0 (best)).
    8. Health-Related Quality of Life Score as assessed by PROMIS-29 at Month 18 [18 months]
      The PROMIS-29 includes seven health related quality of life domains (Physical Functioning, Anxiety, Depression, Fatigue, Sleep Disturbance, Social Functioning, and Pain), and the pain domain has two subdomains (interference and intensity). Raw scores, except pain intensity, are transformed using the T-score metric based on the item response theory calibrations in which scores have a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 for the general population in the US. A higher PROMIS T-score implies more of the concept being measured; i.e., a higher PROMIS score on physical function indicates better functioning, whereas a higher score on depression indicates more severe depressive symptoms. Will report overall score and scores for each domain. From these data will also calculate a PROMIS-Preference (PROPr score) (PROPr scores range from -0.022 (worst) to 1.0 (best)).
    9. Depressive Symptom Score at Month 6 [6 months]
      Depressive Symptoms as assessed by PROMIS Short Form (PROMIS SF) v1.0 - Depression 4a. Raw scores are transformed using the T-score metric based on the item response theory calibrations in which scores have a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 for the general population in the US. A higher PROMIS T-score implies more of the concept being measured; i.e., a higher PROMIS score on depression indicates more severe depressive symptoms.
    10. Depressive Symptom Score at Month 12 [12 months]
      Depressive Symptoms as assessed by PROMIS SF v1.0 - Depression 4a. Raw scores are transformed using the T-score metric based on the item response theory calibrations in which scores have a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 for the general population in the US. A higher PROMIS T-score implies more of the concept being measured; i.e., a higher PROMIS score on depression indicates more severe depressive symptoms.
    11. Depressive Symptom Score at Month 18 [18 months]
      Depressive Symptoms as assessed by PROMIS SF v1.0 - Depression 4a. Raw scores are transformed using the T-score metric based on the item response theory calibrations in which scores have a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 for the general population in the US. A higher PROMIS T-score implies more of the concept being measured; i.e., a higher PROMIS score on depression indicates more severe depressive symptoms.
    12. Diabetes Distress Score as assessed by Problem Areas in Diabetes (PAID)-11 at Month 6 [6 months]
      Score ranges from 11-55 with higher scores indicating greater diabetes distress
    13. Diabetes Distress Score as assessed by PAID-11 at Month 12 [12 months]
      Score ranges from 11-55 with higher scores indicating greater diabetes distress
    14. Diabetes Distress Score as assessed by PAID-11 at Month 18 [18 months]
      Score ranges from 11-55 with higher scores indicating greater diabetes distress

    Eligibility Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study 18 Years and Older (Adult, Older Adult)
    Sexes Eligible for Study All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers No
    Inclusion Criteria
    • ale or female
    • Diagnosis of HIV
    • Diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus or high risk for type 2 diabetes mellitus, defined as meeting CDC eligibility criteria for the diabetes prevention program. Specifically, an individual without a diagnosis of T2DM must 1) have had a blood test result in the prediabetes range within the past year (Hemoglobin A1C: 5.7-6.4% OR Fasting plasma glucose: 100-125 mg/dL OR Two-hour plasma glucose [after a 75 g glucose load]: 140-199 mg/dL), 2) Have been previously diagnosed with gestational diabetes, OR 3) have a high-risk result (score of 5 or higher) on the Prediabetes Risk Test (https://www.cdc.gov/prediabetes/pdf/Prediabetes-Risk-Test-Final.pdf)
    • Experiencing food insecurity as indicated by 2-item Hunger Vital Sign
    • English speaking
    • Aged ≥18 years
    • BMI ≥ 23 kg/m2
    • No plans to move from the area for at least 1 year
    • Free living to the extent that participant has control over dietary intake
    • Willing and able to provide written informed consent and participate in all study activities
    Exclusion Criteria
    • Participant in diabetes, nutrition, or weight research intervention in last 12 months
    • Current AIDS defining illness
    • Another family member or household member is a study participant. Only one member of each household may take part in this study.
    • Considering bariatric surgery in the next year or prior bariatric surgery in the past 2 years
    • Lack of safe, stable residence and ability to store meals
    • Lack of telephone
    • Pregnancy/breastfeeding or intended pregnancy in the next year
    • History of malignancy, other than non-melanoma skin cancer, unless surgically or medically cured > 5 years ago or in remission. Patients with localized prostate and breast cancer diagnosed during the course of routine screening will not be excluded.
    • Advanced kidney disease (estimated creatinine clearance < 30 ml/min)
    • Known drug or alcohol misuse in the past 6 months
    • Known psychosis or major psychiatric illness that prevents participation with study activities
    • Intermittent use of medications (e.g., oral or intravenous glucocorticoids) that are likely to affect blood sugar

    Contacts and Locations

    Sponsors and Collaborators University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, Community Servings, Massachusetts General Hospital, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)
    Community Servings, Massachusetts General Hospital, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)
    Locations
    • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill | Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States, 27599
    Investigators
    • Principal Investigator: Seth A Berkowitz, MD, MPH, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

    More Information

    Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

    • Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
    • Diabetes Mellitus
    • Glucose Metabolism Disorders
    • Metabolic Diseases
    • Endocrine System Diseases