A Randomized, Double-blind, Vehicle-controlled, Multicenter Phase III Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of BF-200 ALA (Ameluz®) in the Field-directed Treatment of Actinic Keratosis on the Extremities and Neck/Trunk With Photodynamic Therapy (PDT) Using the BF-RhodoLED® XL or BF-RhodoLED® Lamp
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this data on November 6, 2024. Link to the current ClinicalTrials.gov record.Recruitment Status
RECRUITING (See Contacts and Locations)Verified November 2024 by Biofrontera Bioscience GmbH
Sponsor
Biofrontera Bioscience GmbHInformation Provided by (Responsible Party)
Biofrontera Bioscience GmbHClinicaltrials.gov Identifier
NCT05662202Other Study ID Numbers: ALA-AK-CT019
First Submitted: November 29, 2022
First Posted: December 22, 2022
Last Update Posted: November 7, 2024
Last Verified: November 2024
History of Changes
Listing a study on this site does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. The safety and scientific validity of a study listed on ClinicalTrials.gov is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Know the risks and potential benefits of clinical studies and talk to your health care provider before participating.
ClinicalTrials.gov, a resource provided by the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), is a registry and results information database of clinical research studies sponsored or funded by a broad range of public and private organizations around the world. Not all studies listed on ClinicalTrials.gov are funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) or other agencies of the U.S. Federal Government. Not all listed studies are regulated and/or reviewed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration or other governmental entities.
Information on ClinicalTrials.gov is provided by study sponsors and investigators, and they are responsible for ensuring that the studies follow all applicable laws and regulations. NLM staff do not verify the scientific validity or relevance of the submitted information beyond a limited quality control review for apparent errors, deficiencies, or inconsistencies.
Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Before you participate in a study, discuss all options with your health care provider and other trusted advisors. For more information about participating in clinical studies, see Learn About Clinical Studies, which includes questions that you might want to ask before deciding to participate in a study.
For more information about using the information on ClinicalTrials.gov, please also see Terms and Conditions.
See also the Web Policies and Notices for the NIH web site.
Study Description
Not ProvidedCondition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
|
|
Study Design
Study Type | Interventional |
---|---|
Anticipated Enrollment | 165 participants |
Design Allocation | Randomized |
Interventional Model | Parallel Assignment |
Masking | Quadruple |
Primary Purpose | Treatment |
Official Title | A Randomized, Double-blind, Vehicle-controlled, Multicenter Phase III Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of BF-200 ALA (Ameluz®) in the Field-directed Treatment of Actinic Keratosis on the Extremities and Neck/Trunk With Photodynamic Therapy (PDT) Using the BF-RhodoLED® XL or BF-RhodoLED® Lamp |
Study Start Date | December 12, 2022 |
Anticipated Primary Completion Date | September 2025 |
Anticipated Study Completion Date | June 2026 |
Groups and Cohorts
Group/ Cohort | Intervention/ Treatment |
---|---|
|
|
|
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Overall subject complete response rate [12 weeks after the last PDT (Visit 4 or Visit 6)] Percentage of subjects with all AK target lesions clinically cleared after last PDT
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Overall subject complete response rate for subjects with lesions treated on extremities [12 weeks after the last PDT (Visit 4 or Visit 6)] Percentage of subjects with all AK target lesions on extremities clinically cleared after last PDT
- Overall subject complete response rate for subjects with lesions treated on neck/trunk [12 weeks after the last PDT (Visit 4 or Visit 6)] Percentage of subjects with all AK target lesions on neck/trunk clinically cleared after last PDT
- Lesion complete response rate [12 weeks after the last PDT (Visit 4 or Visit 6)] Percentage of clinically cleared individual AK target lesions in relation to total number of AK target lesions at baseline (Visit 2) after the last PDT, overall and stratified by treatment area and AK severity at baseline (according to Olsen)
- Complete response rate for severe lesions [12 weeks after the last PDT (Visit 4 or Visit 6)] Percentage of clinically cleared individual severe AK lesions in relation to total number of severe AK lesions at baseline (according to Olsen; Visit 2) after the last PDT, overall and stratified by treatment area
- Subject complete response rate after PDT-1 [12 weeks after PDT-1 (Visit 4)] Percentage of subjects with all AK target lesions clinically cleared after PDT-1, overall and stratified by AK baseline parameters
- Lesion complete response rate after PDT-1 [12 weeks after PDT-1 (Visit 4)] Percentage of clinically cleared individual AK target lesions in relation to total number of AK target lesions at baseline (Visit 2) after PDT-1, overall and stratified by treatment area and AK severity at baseline (according to Olsen [mild, moderate, severe])
- Complete response rate for severe lesions after PDT-1 [12 weeks after PDT-1 (Visit 4)] Percentage of clinically cleared individual severe AK lesions in relation to total number of severe AK lesions at baseline (according to Olsen [mild, moderate, severe]; Visit 2) after PDT-1, overall and stratified by treatment area
- Esthetic appearance at the end of treatment phase assessed by the investigator [On final visit of the treatment phase, 12 weeks after the last PDT (Visit 4 or Visit 6)] The esthetic appearance after the last PDT as assessed by the investigator as assessed by the subject according to a 4-point scale ranging from 0 (=very good) to 3 (=unsatisfactory); overall and stratified by treatment area
- Esthetic outcome at the end of treatment phase assessed by the subject [On final visit of the treatment phase, 12 weeks after the last PDT (Visit 4 or Visit 6)] The esthetic outcome after the last PDT as assessed by the subject according to a 4-point scale ranging from 0 (=very good) to 3 (=unsatisfactory); overall and stratified by treatment area
- Satisfaction with PDT at the end of treatment phase [On final visit of the treatment phase, 12 weeks after the last PDT (Visit 4 or Visit 6)] Satisfaction with PDT treatment after the last PDT as assessed by the subject via questionnaire, 1. if they would chose PDT treatment in the future in case of recurrence or similar disease (yes/no) and 2. how they would rate the PDT treatment in comparison to other treatment modalities, if applicable (better than/ similar/ worse). The treatment modalities should be documented, if applicable); overall and stratified by treatment area
- Frequency and extent of adverse events (AEs), AEs of Special Interest (AESIs), serious AEs (SAEs) and treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) during treatment phase [Entire study duration, approx. 16 weeks for subjects requiring 1 PDT (until Visit 4) and approx. 28 weeks for subjects with 2 PDTs (until Visit 6)] Frequency and extent of AEs, AESIs, SAEs, and TEAEs, overall and stratified by demographics, skin type class (I-III and IV-VI), size of the treatment field, and treatment area.
TEAEs (including application site skin reactions and discomfort) are defined as all AEs with onset or worsening after treatment with IMP. - New lesions inside the treatment field during treatment phase [All clinical visits throughout entire study duration, approx. 16 weeks for subjects requiring 1 PDT (until Visit 4) and approx. 28 weeks for subjects with 2 PDTs (until Visit 6)] New lesions: AK, non-melanoma skin cancer [NMSC, including Basal Cell Carcinoma (BCC), Squamous Cell Carcinoma (SCC) or Bowen's Disease (BD)] or melanoma
- Assessment of application site reactions [All visits (except screening, Visit 1) throughout entire study duration, approx. 16 weeks for subjects requiring 1 PDT (until Visit 4) and approx. 28 weeks for subjects with 2 PDTs (until Visit 6)] Application site reactions (bleeding, burning, discharge, edema, erosion, erythema, exfoliation, hyperalgesia, induration, irritation, paraesthesia, pruritus, pustules, scabbing, or vesicles) will be assessed on a 4-point scale: grade 0 = none, grade 1 = mild, grade 2 = moderate, grade 3 = severe.
- Application site pain during illumination [During treatment (illumination) on treatment day for PDT-1 (Visit 2, up to 4 weeks after screening) and during treatment (illumination) on treatment day for PDT-2 (Visit 4; if applicable; 12 weeks after PDT-1)] Reported by the subjects assessed on an 11-point numeric rating scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain); overall and stratified by size of the treatment field and treatment area
- Number of patients with significant changes of vital signs [All clinical visits throughout entire study duration, approx. 16 weeks for subjects requiring 1 PDT (until Visit 4) and approx. 28 weeks for subjects with 2 PDTs (until Visit 6)] Number of patients with changes in blood pressure (systolic and diastolic) [mmHg] and changes in pulse rate [beats/min]. Findings which differ from reference range and are considered to be clinically significant are to be reported.
- Number of patients with significant changes in safety laboratory [All clinical visits throughout entire study duration, approx. 16 weeks for subjects requiring 1 PDT (until Visit 4) and approx. 28 weeks for subjects with 2 PDTs (until Visit 6)] Changes in clinical chemistry, in hematology and urinalysis parameters as defined in the protocol. Findings which differ from reference range and are considered to be clinically significant are to be reported.
- Number of patients with abnormal findings in physical examination [At screening (up to 4 weeks before treatment) and 12 weeks after the last PDT (Visit 4 or Visit 6)] Physical examination of head, neck, skin, lymph nodes, thorax including heart and lungs, abdomen, and musculoskeletal, peripheral vascular and nervous system status will be performed. Abnormal findings, considered to be clinically significant, are to be reported.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study | 18 Years and Older (Adult, Older Adult) |
---|---|
Sexes Eligible for Study | All |
Accepts Healthy Volunteers | No |
Inclusion Criteria |
|
Exclusion Criteria |
|
Contacts and Locations
Sponsors and Collaborators | Biofrontera Bioscience GmbH |
---|---|
Locations |
|
Investigators |
|
More Information
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Keratosis, Actinic
- Keratosis
- Skin Diseases
- Precancerous Conditions
- Neoplasms