Systemic Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Publication Date: February 20, 2022
Last Updated: March 14, 2022
First-line treatment for HCC in patients with preserved liver function
In patients with HCC with preserved liver function not eligible for LRT or resection or with metastatic disease, the AGA suggests atezolizumab+bevacizumab over sorafenib. ( Low , Conditional (weak) )
Comment: Gastrointestinal bleeding is a known adverse effect of bevacizumab and individuals should undergo endoscopic evaluation and treatment for esophageal varices before treatment.
612
In patients with HCC with preserved liver function not eligible for LRT or resection or with metastatic disease who are not candidates for treatment with atezolizumab+bevacizumab, the AGA suggests either lenvatinib or sorafenib over no systemic therapy. ( Low , Conditional (weak) )
Comments: Patients who place a higher value on delayed radiologic disease progression and lower value on the increase in adverse events (both serious and leading to discontinuation of the drug) may reasonably choose lenvatinib over sorafenib. Patients who place a higher value on blood pressure control and a lower value on the adverse skin reactions would reasonably select sorafenib over lenvatinib. It should be noted that lenvatinib has not been studied in patients with invasion of the main portal vein and thus may not be appropriate for this population. Patients who place a higher value on the adverse events associated with sorafenib or lenvatinib and lower value on the reduction in mortality (2.8 mo for sorafenib, unknown for lenvatinib) may reasonably select no systemic therapy.
612
Second-line treatment for individuals with disease progression or intolerance to first-line systemic therapy
In patients with HCC with preserved liver function not eligible for LRT or resection or with metastatic disease, who had progression of disease on sorafenib, the AGA suggests cabozantinib over no systemic therapy. ( Very Low , Conditional (weak) )
Comment: Patients who place a higher value on adverse effects associated with cabozantinib and lower value on the reduction in mortality (2.2 mo) may reasonably decline cabozantinib.
612
In patients with HCC with preserved liver function not eligible for LRT or resection or with metastatic disease, and who had progression of disease on sorafenib, the AGA suggests using pembrolizumab over no systemic therapy. ( Low , Conditional (weak) )
Comments: Patients who place a higher value on adverse effects associated with pembrolizumab and lower value on the reduction in mortality (3.3 mo) may reasonably decline pembrolizumab. Patients with main portal vein invasion or inferior vena cava or cardiac involvement of HCC on the basis of imaging were not studied.
612
In patients with HCC with preserved liver function and AFP >400 ng/mL not eligible for LRT or resection or with metastatic disease who had progression of disease on sorafenib, the AGA suggests using ramucirumab over no systemic therapy. ( Low , Conditional (weak) )
Comments: Patients who place a higher value on adverse effects associated with ramucirumab and lower value on the reduction in mortality (1.2 mo) may reasonably decline ramucirumab. In patients with AFP < 400 ng/mL, the AGA suggests against the use of ramucirumab.
612
In patients with HCC with preserved liver function not eligible for LRT or resection or with metastatic disease, who had progression of disease on sorafenib, the AGA suggests regorafenib over no systemic therapy. ( Low , Conditional (weak) )
Comment: Patients who place a higher value on adverse effects associated with regorafenib and lower value on the reduction in mortality (2.8 mo) may reasonably decline regorafenib. Regorafenib should not be used in patients who did not tolerate sorafenib due to toxicity.
612
Systemic therapy for HCC in patients with poor liver function
In patients with HCC with poor liver function not eligible for LRT or resection or with metastatic disease, the AGA suggests against routine use of sorafenib. ( Very Low , Conditional (weak) )
Comment: Patients, particularly those who are not CTP C, who place a higher value on the uncertain reduction in mortality and lower value on the harms, may reasonably select to use sorafenib.
612
Systemic therapy for HCC as adjuvant therapy
In patients with HCC undergoing curative surgical resection, the AGA suggests against adjuvant sorafenib therapy. ( Low , Conditional (weak) )
612
In patients with HCC undergoing curative local ablation, the AGA suggests against adjuvant sorafenib therapy. ( Low , Conditional (weak) )
612
In patients with HCC undergoing TACE LRT, the AGA suggests against adjuvant sorafenib therapy. ( Very Low , Conditional (weak) )
612
In patients with HCC undergoing TACE LRT the AGA suggests against adjuvant bevacizumab therapy. ( Very Low , Conditional (weak) )
612
Recommendation Grading
Overview
Title
Systemic Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Authoring Organization
American Gastroenterological Association
Publication Month/Year
February 20, 2022
Last Updated Month/Year
October 3, 2024
Supplemental Implementation Tools
Document Type
Guideline
Country of Publication
US
Document Objectives
The focus of this guideline was to provide guidance on the use of systemic therapy in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
Target Patient Population
Patients with HCC
Inclusion Criteria
Male, Female, Adult, Infant
Health Care Settings
Ambulatory, Outpatient, Operating and recovery room
Intended Users
Nurse, nurse practitioner, physician, physician assistant
Scope
Treatment, Management
Diseases/Conditions (MeSH)
D006528 - Carcinoma, Hepatocellular
Keywords
systemic therapy, hepatocellular carcinoma, liver cancer, hcc
Source Citation
Grace L. Su, Osama Altayar, Robert O’Shea, Raj Shah, Bassam Estfan, Candice Wenzell, Shahnaz Sultan, Yngve Falck-Ytter, AGA Clinical Practice Guideline on Systemic Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma, Gastroenterology, Volume 162, Issue 3, 2022, Pages 920-934, ISSN 0016-5085, https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2021.12.276.
Supplemental Methodology Resources
Methodology
Number of Source Documents
132
Literature Search Start Date
December 31, 2006
Literature Search End Date
May 14, 2020