Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer

Publication Date: March 1, 2018
Last Updated: March 14, 2022

Guidelines

SHARED DECISION MAKING

1. Counseling of patients to select a management strategy for localized prostate cancer should incorporate SDM and explicitl consider cancer severity (risk category), patient values and preferences, life expectancy, pre-treatment general functional and genitourinary symptoms, expected posttreatment functional status, and potential for salvage treatment.

(Strong, A)
322859

2. Prostate cancer patients should be counseled regarding the importance of modifiable health-related behaviors or risk factors, such as smoking and obesity.

(Expert Opinion, )
322859

3. Clinicians should encourage patients to meet with different prostate cancer care specialists (e.g., urology and either radiation oncology or medical oncology or both) when possible to promote informed decision making.

(Moderate, B)
322859

4. Effective SDM in prostate cancer care requires clinicians to inform patients about immediate and long-term morbidity or side effects of proposed treatment or care options.

(Clinical Principle, )
322859

5. Clinicians should inform patients about suitable clinical trials and encourage patients to consider participation in such trials based on eligibility and access.

(Expert Opinion, )
322859

CARE OPTIONS BY CANCER SEVERITY/RISK GROUP

Very Low Risk and Low risk Prostate Cancer

6. Clinicians should not perform abdominopelvic CT or routine bone scans in the staging of asymptomatic very low or low risk localized prostate cancer patients.

(Strong, C)
322859

7. Clinicians should recommend active surveillance as the best available care option for very low risk localized prostate cancer patients.

(Strong, A)
322859

8. Clinicians should recommend active surveillance as the preferable care option for most low risk localized prostate cancer patients.

(Moderate, B)
322859

9. Clinicians may offer definitive treatment (i.e. radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy) to select low risk localized prostate cancer patients who may have a high probability of progression on active surveillance.

(Conditional, B)
322859

10. Clinicians should not add androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) along with radiotherapy for low risk localized prostate cancer with the exception of reducing the size of the prostate for brachytherapy.

(Strong, B)
322859

11. Clinicians should inform low risk prostate cancer patients considering whole gland cryosurgery that consequent side effects are considerable and survival benefit has not been shown in comparison to active surveillance.

(Conditional, C)
322859

12. Clinicians should inform low risk prostate cancer patients who are considering focal therapy or HIFU that these interventions are not standard care options because comparative outcome evidence is lacking.

(Expert Opinion, )
322859

13. Clinicians should recommend observation or watchful waiting for men with a life expectancy £5 years with low risk localized prostate cancer.

(Strong, B)
322859

14. Among most low risk localized prostate cancer patients, tissue based genomic biomarkers have not shown a clear role in the selection of candidates for active surveillance.

(Expert Opinion, )
322859

Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer

15. Clinicians should consider staging unfavorable intermediate risk localized prostate cancer patients with cross-sectional imaging (CT or MRI) and bone scan.

(Expert Opinion, )
322859

16. Clinicians should recommend radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy plus ADT as standard treatment options for patients with intermediate risk localized prostate cancer.

(Strong, A)
322859

17. Clinicians should inform patients that favorable intermediate risk prostate cancer can be treated with radiation alone, but the evidence basis is less robust than for combining radiotherapy with ADT.

(Moderate, B)
322859

18. In select patients with intermediate risk localized prostate cancer, clinicians may consider other treatment options such as cryosurgery.

(Conditional, C)
322859

19. Active surveillance may be offered to select patients with favorable intermediate risk localized prostate cancer. However, patients should be informed that this comes with a higher risk of developing metastases compared to definitive treatment.

(Conditional, C)
322859

20. Clinicians should recommend observation or watchful waiting for men with a life expectancy £5 years with intermediate risk localized prostate cancer.

(Strong, A)
322859

21. Clinicians should inform intermediate risk prostate cancer patients who are considering focal therapy or HIFU that these interventions are not standard care options because comparative outcome evidence is lacking.

(Expert Opinion, )
322859

High Risk Prostate Cancer

22. Clinicians should stage high risk localized prostate cancer patients with crosssectional imaging (CT or MRI) and bone scan.

(Clinical Principle, )
322859

23. Clinicians should recommend radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy plus ADT as standard treatment options for patients with high risk localized prostate cancer.

(Strong, A)
322859

24. Clinicians should not recommend active surveillance for patients with high risk localized prostate cancer. Watchful waiting should only be considered in asymptomatic men with limited life expectancy (£5 years).

(Moderate, C)
322859

25. Cryosurgery, focal therapy, and HIFU treatments are not recommended for men with high-risk localized prostate cancer outside of a clinical trial.

(Expert Opinion, )
322859

26. Clinicians should not recommend primary ADT for patients with high risk localized prostate cancer unless the patient has both limited life expectancy and local symptoms.

(Strong, A)
322859

27. Clinicians may consider referral for genetic counseling for patients (and their families) with high risk localized prostate cancer and a strong family history of specific cancers (e.g., breast, ovarian, pancreatic, other gastrointestinal tumors, lymphoma).

(Expert Opinion, )
322859

Recommendation Grading

Overview

Title

Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer

Authoring Organizations

American Society for Radiation Oncology

American Urological Association

Society of Urologic Oncology

Publication Month/Year

March 1, 2018

Last Updated Month/Year

June 7, 2023

Supplemental Implementation Tools

Document Type

Guideline

External Publication Status

Published

Country of Publication

US

Inclusion Criteria

Male, Adult, Older adult

Health Care Settings

Hospital, Operating and recovery room, Outpatient

Intended Users

Nurse, nurse practitioner, physician, physician assistant

Scope

Assessment and screening, Management, Treatment

Diseases/Conditions (MeSH)

D011471 - Prostatic Neoplasms

Keywords

prostate cancer, prostatic neoplasms

Source Citation

Sanda, M. G., Cadeddu, J. A., Kirkby, E., Chen, R. C., Crispino, T., Fontanarosa, J., … Treadwell, J. R. (2018). Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer: AUA/ASTRO/SUO Guideline. Part I: Risk Stratification, Shared Decision Making, and Care Options. The Journal of Urology, 199(3), 683–690. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2017.11.095

Methodology

Number of Source Documents
342
Literature Search Start Date
January 1, 2007
Literature Search End Date
August 1, 2016