Endoscopic Eradication Therapy of Barrett’s Esophagus and Related Neoplasia

Publication Date: May 17, 2024
Last Updated: November 12, 2024

Summary of Recommendations

Recommendation 1

In individuals with BE with high-grade dysplasia (HGD), AGA recommends EET over surveillance.

( Moderate , Strong )

Implementation Considerations:

  • Following completion of EET, surveillance should be performed at 3, 6, and 12 months, then annually.
  • Surveillance endoscopies after EET should obtain targeted tissue sampling of visible lesions and random biopsies of the cardia and distal 2 cm of the tubular esophagus.
612

Recommendation 2

In individuals with BE with low-grade dysplasia (LGD), AGA suggests for EET over surveillance. Patients who place a higher value on the well-defined harms and lower value on the benefits (which are uncertain) regarding reduction of esophageal cancer mortality would reasonably select surveillance endoscopy.

( Low , Conditional (weak) )
Implementation considerations:
  • After completion of EET, surveillance should be performed at years 1 and 3 after complete eradication of intestinal metaplasia (CEIM), then revert to surveillance intervals used in nondysplastic Barrett’s esophagus (NDBE).
  • The tissue sampling protocol during surveillance should be performed the same as in surveillance after EET for HGD
612

Recommendation 3

In individuals with NDBE, AGA suggests against the routine use of EET.

( Very Low , Conditional (weak) )
612

Recommendation 4

In patients undergoing EET, AGA suggests resection of visible lesions followed by ablation of the remaining BE segment over resection of the entire BE segment. ( Very Low , Conditional (weak) )

Implementation Considerations:

  • In patients with only a small area of BE beyond the visible lesion, completion endoscopic resection in the same setting is acceptable and may be preferred over repeated procedures to perform ablation.
  • Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is the preferred ablative modality.
612

Recommendation 5

In individuals with BE with visible neoplastic lesions that are undergoing endoscopic resection, the AGA suggests the use of either endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) or endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) based on lesion characteristics.

( Very Low , Conditional (weak) )

Implementation Considerations:

  • Patients suspected of having T1 esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) should be referred for consideration of EET.
  • Endoscopic resection is the test of choice over endoscopic ultrasound for distinguishing EAC from HGD and for staging depth of invasion in early cancer.
  • The vast majority of neoplastic lesions may be managed with EMR rather than ESD.
  • Patients with large bulky neoplastic lesions or lesions highly suspicious of at least T1b invasion (for instance those with depressed, Paris IIc, or IIa+c lesions) and deemed candidates for endoscopic resection might benefit from ESD over EMR.
  • Patients with previously failed EMR might benefit from ESD.
612

Additional Information

General Implementation Considerations

  • In patients with BE, counsel tobacco cessation and weight loss if overweight.
  • Refer patients with dysplastic BE to high-volume endoscopists with expertise in EET, pathologists with expertise in BE neoplasia, with access to multidisciplinary care.
  • Histologic diagnosis of BE dysplasia or early cancer should be confirmed by an expert pathologist.
  • In patients undergoing management of dysplastic BE, optimize reflux control with medication, lifestyle modifications, and assessing adherence.
  • Before embarking on EET, discuss risks and benefits of EET, need for adherence with reflux management, expected outcomes, need for continued surveillance after completion of EET, with adequate time to assess patient values and preferences.
  • The goal of EET should be complete eradication of intestinal metaplasia and neoplasia.
  • Failure to achieve complete eradication of intestinal metaplasia should prompt reassessment and optimization of reflux control.
  • Endoscopists and practices performing EET are encouraged to monitor key outcomes and quality metrics, including complete eradication of intestinal metaplasia and neoplasia and adverse events.

Video

Recommendation Grading

Abbreviations

  • AGA: American Gastroenterological Association
  • BE: Barrett’s Esophagus
  • CEIM: Complete Eradication Of Intestinal Metaplasia
  • EAC: Esophageal Adenocarcinoma
  • EET: Endoscopic Eradication Therapy
  • EMR: Endoscopic Mucosal Resection
  • ESD: Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
  • HGD: High-grade Dysplasia
  • LGD: Low-grade Dysplasia
  • NDBE: Nondysplastic Barrett’s Esophagus
  • RFA: Radiofrequency Ablation
  • sEMR: Stepwise Endoscopic Mucosal Resection

Disclaimer

The information in this patient summary should not be used as a substitute for professional medical care or advice. Contact a health care provider if you have questions about your health.

Overview

Title

Endoscopic Eradication Therapy of Barrett’s Esophagus and Related Neoplasia

Authoring Organization

American Gastroenterological Association

Publication Month/Year

May 17, 2024

Last Updated Month/Year

October 3, 2024

Document Type

Guideline

Country of Publication

US

Document Objectives

Barrett’s esophagus (BE) is the precursor to esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). Endoscopic eradication therapy (EET) can be effective in eradicating BE and related neoplasia and has greater risk of harms and resource use than surveillance endoscopy. This clinical practice guideline aims to inform clinicians and patients by providing evidence-based practice recommendations for the use of EET in BE and related neoplasia.

Target Patient Population

Patients with Barrett’s esophagus (BE) who are candidates for endoscopic eradication therapy (EET)

PICO Questions

  1. Should patients with Barrett's esophagus (BE) with high-grade dysplasia (HGD) undergo endoscopic eradication therapy (EET)?

  2. Should patients with Barrett's esophagus (BE) with low-grade dysplasia (LGD) undergo endoscopic eradication therapy (EET)?

  3. Should patients with Barrett's esophagus (BE) without dysplasia undergo endoscopic eradication therapy (EET)?

  4. In patients undergoing endoscopic eradication therapy (EET), should patients undergo resection of the entire Barrett's esophagus (BE) segment versus resection of visible lesions followed by ablation of the remaining Barrett's esophagus (BE) segment?

  5. In patients undergoing endoscopic resection of a visible lesion, should patients undergo primary endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) versus endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR)?

Inclusion Criteria

Male, Female, Adult, Older adult

Health Care Settings

Ambulatory, Outpatient, Operating and recovery room

Intended Users

Nurse, nurse practitioner, physician, physician assistant

Scope

Management

Diseases/Conditions (MeSH)

D001471 - Barrett Esophagus, D004938 - Esophageal Neoplasms, D005770 - Gastrointestinal Neoplasms

Keywords

esophageal adenocarcinoma, Barrett’s esophagus, Endoscopic Eradication Therapy, neoplasia, Barrett esophagus

Source Citation

Rubenstein JH, Sawas T, Wani S, Eluri S, Singh S, Chandar AK, Perumpail RB, Inadomi JM, Thrift AP, Piscoya A, Sultan S, Singh S, Katzka D, Davitkov P. AGA Clinical Practice Guideline on Endoscopic Eradication Therapy of Barrett's Esophagus and Related Neoplasia. Gastroenterology. 2024 Jun;166(6):1020-1055. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2024.03.019. PMID: 38763697.

Methodology

Number of Source Documents
170
Literature Search Start Date
March 1, 2016
Literature Search End Date
January 1, 2023