Diagnosis of Upper Quadrant Lymphedema Secondary to Cancer
Practice Recommendations Based on Patient Presentation
All Patients At Risk for Secondary Upper Quadrant Lymphedema
At Risk/Early Upper Extremity Lymphedema (ILS Stage 0-I)
Bioimpedance Analysis:
- Cutpoint of >7.1 L-Dex score should be used for diagnosis of breast cancer–related lymphedema when preoperative baseline measures are not available.
- Cutpoint of >10 L-Dex score above preoperative baseline should be used for diagnosis of breast cancer–related lymphedema.
- Preoperative assessment using BIA may enhance the ability to detect changes in tissue fluid earlier indicating lymphedema.
Volume Measures:
- When using circumferential measurements, volume should be calculated.
- Calculated volume differential between sides ≥200 ml, or a volume ratio of >1.04 (affected:unaffected), will help rule in lymphedema, but values <200 ml cannot be used to rule out.
- Water displacement may be used in diagnosing lymphedema but is limited by clinical utility.
- Volume can also be assessed by perometry, but diagnostic criteria need to be evaluated for this method.
- Methods of volume measurement are not interchangeable; use the same method at each time point.
Moderate or Established Upper Extremity Lymphedema (ILS Stage II)
Bioimpedance Analysis:
Volume Measures:
- When using circumferential measurements, volume should be calculated.
- Calculated volume differential between sides of ≥200 ml, or a volume ratio of >1.04 (affected:unaffected), will help rule in lymphedema, but values <200 ml cannot be used to rule out.
- Water displacement may be used in diagnosing lymphedema but is limited by clinical utility.
- Volume can also be assessed by perometry but diagnostic criteria need to be evaluated for this method.
- Methods of volume measurement are not interchangeable; use the same method each time point.
Late Upper Extremity Lymphedema (ILS Stage III)
Volume Measures:
- When using circumferential measurements, volume should be calculated.
- Calculated volume differential between sides of ≥200 ml, or a volume ratio of >1.04 (affected:unaffected), will help rule in lymphedema, but values <200 ml cannot be used to rule out.
- Water displacement may be used in diagnosing lymphedema but has limited clinical utility.
- Volume can also be assessed by perometry, but diagnostic criteria need to be evaluated for this method
- Methods of volume measurement are not interchangeable; use the same method at each time point.
Ultrasound:
- Ultrasound should be utilized to detect underlying tissue changes.
Hand Lymphedema
- Water displacement and figure of 8 method of circumferential measurement may be used for assessment but have not been studied as diagnostic tests.
Trunk or Breast Lymphedema
- Ultrasound has the potential to determine tissue changes consistent with different stages of lymphedema.
- Tissue dielectric constant is an emerging diagnostic tool that may be useful in assisting with assessment of lymphedema.
Head and Neck Lymphedema
Recommendation Grading
Overview
Title
Diagnosis of Upper Quadrant Lymphedema Secondary to Cancer
Authoring Organization
American Physical Therapy Association
Publication Month/Year
May 5, 2017
Last Updated Month/Year
August 3, 2023
Document Type
Guideline
External Publication Status
Published
Country of Publication
US
Inclusion Criteria
Female, Male, Adult, Older adult
Health Care Settings
Ambulatory, Emergency care, Home health, Operating and recovery room, Outpatient
Intended Users
Physical therapist, occupational therapist, nurse, nurse practitioner, physician, physician assistant
Scope
Assessment and screening, Diagnosis, Management
Diseases/Conditions (MeSH)
D008206 - Lymphatic Diseases, D000072656 - Breast Cancer Lymphedema
Keywords
cancer, Lymphedema, cancer-related lymphedema
Source Citation
Kimberly Levenhagen, Claire Davies, Marisa Perdomo, Kathryn Ryans, Laura Gilchrist, Diagnosis of Upper Quadrant Lymphedema Secondary to Cancer: Clinical Practice Guideline From the Oncology Section of the American Physical Therapy Association, Physical Therapy, Volume 97, Issue 7, July 2017, Pages 729 745, https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/pzx050