Treatment of Ankylosing Spondylitis and Nonradiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis
Treatment
Recommendations for the Treatment of Adults With AS (Table 2)
Recommendations for Adults With Stable AS
Recommendations for Adults With Active or Stable AS
Recommendations for Adults With AS-Related Comorbidities
Disease Activity Assessment, Imaging, and Screening
Recommendations for the Treatment of Adults With Nonradiographic Axial SpA (Table 3)
Recommendations for Adults With Active Nonradiographic Axial SpA
Recommendations for Adults With Stable Nonradiographic Axial SpA
Recommendations for Adults With Active or Stable Nonradiographic Axial SpA
Disease Activity Assessment and Imaging
Recommendation Grading
Overview
Title
Treatment of Ankylosing Spondylitis and Nonradiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis
Authoring Organizations
American College of Rheumatology
Spondylitis Association of America
Publication Month/Year
August 22, 2019
Last Updated Month/Year
October 8, 2024
Supplemental Implementation Tools
Document Type
Guideline
External Publication Status
Published
Country of Publication
US
Document Objectives
To update evidence-based recommendations for the treatment of patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and nonradiographic axial spondyloarthritis (SpA).
Target Patient Population
Adult patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) or nonradiographic axial spondyloarthritis (SpA)
Target Provider Population
Test provider
PICO Questions
In adults with active or stable AS, is continuous treatment with NSAIDs more effective than on-demand treatment with NSAIDs in improving outcomes?
In adults with active or stable non-radiographic axial SpA, is continuous treatment with NSAIDs more effective than on-demand treatment with NSAIDs in improving outcomes?
In adults with active AS, are certain TNFi more effective than other TNFi in improving outcomes?
In adults with active AS despite treatment with NSAIDs, are TNFi more effective than no treatment with TNFi in improving outcomes?
In adults with active AS despite treatment with NSAIDs, are TNFi more effective than no treatment with TNFi in improving outcomes?
In adults with active non-radiographic axial SpA, are certain TNFi more effective than other TNFi in improving outcomes?
In adults with active AS despite treatment with NSAIDs, are TNFi more effective than no treatment with TNFi in improving outcomes?
In adults with active non-radiographic axial SpA despite treatment with NSAIDs, are TNFi more effective than no treatment with TNFi in improving outcomes?
In adults with active AS despite treatment with NSAIDs, is treatment with an oral small molecule more effective than no treatment with an oral small molecule in improving outcomes?
In adults with active non-radiographic axial SpA despite treatment with NSAIDs, is treatment with an oral small molecule more effective than no treatment with an oral small molecule in improving outcomes?
In adults with active AS despite treatment with NSAIDs and who have contraindications to TNFi, is treatment with a non-TNFi biologic more effective than treatment with an oral small molecule in improving outcomes?
In adults with active non-radiographic axial SpA despite treatment with NSAIDs and who have contraindications to TNFi, is treatment with a non-TNFi biologic more effective than treatment with an oral small molecule in improving outcomes?
In adults with active AS despite treatment with the first TNFi agent used, is switching to a different TNFi more effective than adding methotrexate or sulfasalazine in improving outcomes?
In adults with active non-radiographic axial SpA despite treatment with the first TNFi agent used, is switching to a different TNFi more effective than adding methotrexate or sulfasalazine in improving outcomes?
In adults with active AS despite treatment with the first TNFi agent used, is switching to a different TNFi more effective than switching to a non-TNFi biologic in improving outcomes?
In adults with active non-radiographic axial SpA despite treatment with the first TNFi agent used, is switching to a different TNFi more effective than switching to a non-TNFi biologic in improving outcomes?
In adults with stable AS on treatment with TNFi and NSAIDs, is continuing both medications more effective than continuing treatment with TNFi alone in improving outcomes?
In adults with stable non-radiographic axial SpA on treatment with TNFi and NSAIDs, is continuing both medications more effective than continuing treatment with TNFi alone in improving outcomes?
In adults with stable AS on treatment with TNFi and an oral small molecule, is continuing both medications more effective than withdrawing one treatment and continuing either TNFi or the oral small molecule alone in improving outcomes?
In adults with stable non-radiographic axial SpA on treatment with TNFi and an oral small molecule, is continuing both medications more effective than withdrawing one treatment and continuing either TNFi or the oral small molecule alone in improving outcomes?
Inclusion Criteria
Male, Female, Adult, Older adult
Health Care Settings
Ambulatory
Intended Users
Nurse, nurse practitioner, physician, physician assistant
Scope
Counseling, Treatment, Management
Diseases/Conditions (MeSH)
D013167 - Spondylitis, Ankylosing, D025241 - Spondylarthritis
Keywords
ankylosing spondylitis, axial spondyloarthritis
Source Citation
Ward, M.M., Deodhar, A., Gensler, L.S., Dubreuil, M., Yu, D., Khan, M.A., Haroon, N., Borenstein, D., Wang, R., Biehl, A., Fang, M.A., Louie, G., Majithia, V., Ng, B., Bigham, R., Pianin, M., Shah, A.A., Sullivan, N., Turgunbaev, M., Oristaglio, J., Turner, A., Maksymowych, W.P. and Caplan, L. (2019), 2019 Update of the American College of Rheumatology/Spondylitis Association of America/Spondyloarthritis Research and Treatment Network Recommendations for the Treatment of Ankylosing Spondylitis and Nonradiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis. Arthritis Care Res, 71: 1285-1299. doi:10.1002/acr.24025